• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Industry
    • Exhibits and Support & Visibility Opportunities
    • Industry Archives
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2025 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Upcoming Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2025 Proffered Presentations

2025 Proffered Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

S139: VALIDATION OF A 3D PRINTED MODEL FOR PITUITARY NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOUR RESECTION, VASCULAR INJURY MANAGEMENT, CEREBROSPINAL LEAK REPAIR AND SKULL BASE RECONSTRUCTION
Nicholas G Candy1; Alexander S Zhang2; George Bouras3; Alistair K Jukes1; Stephen Santoreneos1; Nick Vrodos4; Peter-John Womald2; Alkis J Psaltis2; 1Royal Adelaide Hospital; 2Queen Elizabeth Hospital; 3Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Research; 4Flinders Medical Centre

Background: Endoscopic pituitary surgery is a subspecialty field which benefits significantly from high fidelity surgical simulators. Giving trainees an opportunity to practice resection of a sellar tumour and management of a large vessel injury on surgical simulators will improve training.  

Methods: A pituitary surgery course will run for the second iteration at the end of 2024. During the first iteration neurosurgeons and ENT surgeons of varying experience agreed to participate in assessing the validity of a 3D printed pituitary surgery model, figure 1. This model allowed participants to perform a transsphenoidal exposure and resection of a pituitary neuroendocrine tumour, repair a CSF leak, control a carotid injury and repair a skull base defect, figure 2. The content, face and construct validity of the 3D printed model was examined. The second iteration will involve examining time taken to complete each stage of the simulator as well as volume of blood lost during the major vascular injury. This will be correlated with the participants pre-course experience to assess construct validity.

Results: During the first iteration of the course the heart rate of the participants significantly increased from baseline when starting the carotid injury simulation (mean 90vs121) and significantly decreased once the injury was controlled (mean 121vs110). 

The participants reported a significant improvement in anxiety in facing a major vascular injury, an increase in their confidence in management of major vascular injury, resecting a pituitary adenoma and repair of a CSF leak using a 5-point Likert scale (mean 4.42vs3.58 p=0.05, 2.0vs3.25, 2.36vs4.27 and 2.45vs4.0 respectively), figure 3. The data from the second iteration of the course in late 2024 will be used to expand these results. 

Conclusion: Using the data from both iterations of this course will demonstrate validity of a 3D printed surgical simulator for endoscopic pituitary surgery that allows surgeons to practice a transsphenoidal approach and resection of a pituitary adenoma.

Figure 1: The pituitary adenoma, vascular injury and CSF leak repair surgical simulator.

Figure 2: The steps to be completed using the surgical simulator A-N. (A) incising through septal mucosa and beginning to raise a nasoseptal flap (B) removal of left sided septal spur  (C) complete raising of nasoseptal flap and storing in the nasopharynx (D) bilateral middle turbinectomies (E) removal of the sphenoid rostrum (F) peeling the sphenoidal mucosa off the face of the sella (G) high speed drill to thin the bone over the sella (H) Kerrison-Rongeur to complete exposure of sella (I) durotomy (J) resection of the pituitary adenoma (K) injury to the diaphragma with subsequent CSF leak (L) repair of CSF leak using bathplug technique with chicken fat (M) injury to the carotid artery (N) use of two-surgeon four-hand approach to managing major vascular injury and placement of a harvested chicken muscle patch (O) successfully control the haemorrhage

Figure 3: Dot plots demonstrating the change in self rated anxiety and competence for management of carotid injury, as well as management of pituitary adenoma resection and CSF leak repair from the first iteration of the course.

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2025 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved